Skip to content

Pharma.Tips

Unlocking Pharma's Secrets: Your Ultimate Guide to Pharmaceutical Success!

High Cost of Pilot-Scale Formulation Development for Soft Gelatin Capsules

Posted on May 11, 2025 By Admin

High Cost of Pilot-Scale Formulation Development for Soft Gelatin Capsules

Overcoming the High Cost of Pilot-Scale Formulation Development for Soft Gelatin Capsules

Context

Developing a soft gelatin capsule formulation at the pilot scale can be an expensive process, especially for new drug candidates or novel formulations. The costs associated with pilot-scale development include raw materials, equipment, testing, and labor, all of which contribute to the high expenses. Additionally, when dealing with specialized formulations, such as those with low doses, complex release profiles, or sensitive APIs, the process can become even more costly. These expenses can create significant barriers for smaller pharmaceutical companies or

organizations working with limited budgets, impacting their ability to bring innovative products to market efficiently.

Root Causes

  • High Raw Material Costs: Soft gelatin capsules often require specialized excipients and API grades, which can be costly, especially when working with high-potency drugs or novel formulations.
  • Expensive Equipment: Pilot-scale formulation development requires advanced encapsulation equipment, which may be expensive to purchase, maintain, and operate. The need for precise temperature and humidity control, as well as specialized machinery for mixing and filling, can further increase costs.
  • Increased Testing Requirements: Extensive stability testing, dissolution testing, and other quality control measures are required to ensure that the formulation meets regulatory standards. These tests are necessary for ensuring safety, efficacy, and consistency, but they can significantly add to the cost of development.
  • Limited Production Volumes: Pilot-scale batches are typically produced in smaller volumes, making it harder to optimize manufacturing processes and economies of scale. This results in higher per-unit production costs.
  • Labor Costs: The labor involved in pilot-scale development, including formulation development, scale-up, and quality testing, can be significant, especially for complex formulations that require precise adjustments during the development phase.
Pharma Tip:  Inadequate sealing of blister packs, leading to moisture ingress.

Solutions

1. Optimization of Formulation Development Processes

One way to reduce the high costs of pilot-scale development is by optimizing the formulation development process. By improving the efficiency of the formulation, the number of trials required can be reduced, ultimately saving both time and money. Techniques like design of experiments (DoE) and quality by design (QbD) can be used to identify the critical factors in formulation development, helping to streamline the process. These methodologies allow for better prediction and control of formulation behavior, reducing the need for costly trial-and-error adjustments.

2. Scale-Up Simulation and Small-Scale Testing

Rather than immediately moving to a pilot-scale production run, manufacturers can conduct small-scale testing using miniaturized equipment that simulates the conditions of larger-scale production. This approach allows for initial testing and formulation optimization at a much lower cost before scaling up. Small-scale testing can provide valuable insights into the formulation’s behavior and help identify potential issues that could arise during larger production runs.

3. Use of Excipients with Lower Costs

While the selection of excipients must be based on compatibility with the API and the desired release profile, manufacturers can still explore cost-effective alternatives that do not compromise the performance of the soft gelatin capsules. For example, using widely available and less expensive excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) or lactose as diluents can reduce formulation costs. Manufacturers should carefully evaluate the functionality of each excipient to ensure that it provides the necessary performance without increasing overall costs.

4. Collaboration with Contract Development and Manufacturing Organizations (CDMOs)

Partnering with Contract Development and Manufacturing Organizations (CDMOs) can help reduce the financial burden of pilot-scale formulation development. CDMOs offer specialized expertise in formulation and scale-up, which can help reduce development timelines and costs. Outsourcing the pilot-scale development to a CDMO with established infrastructure and equipment can eliminate the need for investing in expensive equipment and reduce operational costs, allowing companies to focus on the development and regulatory aspects of the product.

Pharma Tip:  Challenges in maintaining consistent capsule weight variation during validation.

5. Implementation of Continuous Manufacturing

Continuous manufacturing is a more cost-effective and efficient manufacturing process that allows for the continuous production of pharmaceutical products, including soft gelatin capsules. Unlike traditional batch manufacturing, continuous manufacturing reduces downtime and can help lower the cost per unit of production. By implementing continuous manufacturing for pilot-scale development, manufacturers can achieve better cost efficiency, particularly for products that will eventually be scaled up for commercial production.

6. Use of In-House or Shared Facilities

For smaller companies or those with limited budgets, using shared manufacturing facilities or in-house equipment for pilot-scale production can significantly reduce costs. Shared facilities allow multiple companies to use the same equipment and resources, thus lowering the overall cost of development. These facilities often offer flexible contracts for smaller-scale operations, making it more affordable for companies to conduct pilot-scale development without the need for large capital investments in equipment.

7. Streamlining Regulatory Submission and Testing Processes

To minimize costs associated with regulatory approval, manufacturers should focus on streamlining their submission and testing processes. Working closely with regulatory agencies like the FDA, EMA, and USP early in the development process can help ensure that all necessary testing is conducted efficiently and that any potential issues are addressed promptly. Early alignment with regulatory agencies can reduce the need for costly additional studies or retesting that might arise due to non-compliance or missed requirements.

Regulatory Considerations

Regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA require that all soft gelatin capsules meet specific dissolution and bioequivalence criteria before they are approved for market release. As per USP <711> Dissolution Testing, these capsules must be tested for consistent and predictable release profiles. Additionally, cGMP regulations set forth by the FDA mandate that manufacturers follow strict guidelines during pilot-scale development to ensure that the formulation meets the required safety and efficacy standards. By adhering to these regulations and conducting thorough quality control and stability testing, companies can reduce the risk of costly delays and rework during regulatory review.

Pharma Tip:  High variability in results of content uniformity testing for low-dose drugs.

Industry Trends

The pharmaceutical industry is seeing an increasing focus on cost-effective manufacturing processes due to pressure from both regulatory agencies and consumers to reduce prices while maintaining quality. Advances in continuous manufacturing, lean production techniques, and modular manufacturing are helping to reduce pilot-scale development costs. Additionally, the use of personalized medicine is driving the need for more efficient and flexible production methods, particularly for small batches of drugs. These trends are expected to continue, pushing the industry towards more affordable and scalable manufacturing solutions.

Case Study

Case Study: Reducing Pilot-Scale Costs for a Low-Dose Anticancer Drug

A pharmaceutical company was developing a low-dose anticancer drug in soft gelatin capsules and faced significant costs during the pilot-scale development phase. The company partnered with a CDMO to optimize the formulation and reduce costs associated with equipment and scale-up. By using HPMC capsules as an alternative to gelatin, optimizing the excipient blend for better bioavailability, and implementing continuous manufacturing, the company was able to streamline the production process and reduce development costs by 30%. The product passed all necessary stability and dissolution tests and was successfully submitted for regulatory approval with a reduced timeline and cost.

Capsules (Hard & Soft Gelatin) Tags:Capsule bioavailability, Capsule brittleness, Capsule colorants, Capsule cross-linking, Capsule disintegration time, Capsule dissolution testing, Capsule excipients, Capsule filling machines, Capsule formulation development, Capsule hardness testing, Capsule Manufacturing, Capsule moisture content, capsule packaging solutions, Capsule printing technology, Capsule Quality Control, Capsule sealing techniques, Capsule shell materials, Capsule sizes, Capsule stability studies, Capsule tamper-evidence, capsule weight variation, Delayed-release capsules, Gelatin capsules, Vegetarian capsules, [Enteric-coated capsules

Post navigation

Previous Post: Controlling Spray Rate in Sugar-Coating for Glossy Finish
Next Post: Managing Brittleness in High-Dose Tablets Under Stability Conditions
  • Aerosol Formulations
  • Capsules (Hard & Soft Gelatin)
  • Drug Discovery
  • External Preparations
  • GLP Guidelines
  • GMP Guidelines
  • Medical Devices
  • Parenteral Drug Manufacturing
  • Pharma Quality Control
  • Pharma Research
  • Schedule M
  • Solid Dosage form
  • Solid Oral Dosage Forms
  • Tablets
  • Tablets

Copyright © 2025 Pharma.Tips.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme